Blog

Food Tech and Cultivated Meat: Innovating to Feed the Future

Introduction

Global demand for food is skyrocketing as the population grows. By 2050, the world will need about 70% more food than we produced in 2005. This surge in demand, coupled with strains on land and water, has created a food security challenge.

Food technology (“food tech”) has emerged to tackle this crisis by reimagining how we produce food. One breakthrough gaining traction is lab-grown meat, also known as cultivated meat: real meat grown from animal cells in a controlled environment, without raising or slaughtering livestock. It’s an innovative approach to help feed a growing population sustainably.

Not long ago, lab-grown meat sounded like science fiction. In 2013, scientists like Mark Post at Maastricht University unveiled the first cell-cultured burger, a proof of concept that cost over $300,000 to make. Today, however, the field has advanced rapidly.

Dozens of startups and food companies are investing in cultivated meat as part of the alternative protein movement. Industry experts see it as a promising solution to fill the gap between protein demand and supply.

In fact, analysts project the cultivated meat market could reach $25 billion by 2030, underlining the growth potential of this sector. Investors have poured more than $3 billion into over 175 cultivated meat companies globally as of 2023.

It’s not just startups, major food corporations, and governments are also paying attention, as seen in the latest Future Food-Tech San Francisco, where leaders emphasized that biomanufacturing innovations and partnerships will be key to scaling up production to meet future needs.

The rise of cultivated meat signals a forward-thinking shift in food tech, aiming to ensure that everyone can enjoy burgers, chicken, and seafood in the years ahead without running up against the limits of traditional agriculture.

What is Cultivated Meat?

Cultivated meat (also called cultured meat or lab-grown meat) is genuine animal meat grown directly from cells, instead of from a slaughtered animal.

In simple terms, producers take a tiny sample of animal cells (for example, muscle cells from a cow or chicken) and place them in a warm, nutrient-rich environment to proliferate.

The cells are nurtured in tanks called bioreactors, which are like fermentation vessels that provide the right temperature and nutrients for the cells to multiply and form muscle tissue.

Over time, usually several weeks, those cells grow into the same kinds of meat fibers you’d find in a cut of meat from an animal. The result is real meat, just made in a novel way.

Importantly, the end product is nutritionally comparable to conventional meat. Producers even add essential nutrients (like iron and vitamin B12) to the growth medium to ensure the cultivated meat has similar nutritional value to its farm-raised counterpart.

In essence, if you cook and taste cultivated meat, it looks, smells, and nourishes just like the meat we’re used to, because it is meat, down to the cellular level.

It’s helpful to distinguish cultivated meat from the more familiar plant-based meat alternatives. Plant-based meats are made entirely from plant ingredients (pea protein, soy, etc.) and contain no animal cells. They’re essentially veggie products engineered to mimic meat’s taste and texture.

Cultivated meat, by contrast, comes from animal cells and thus contains actual animal protein, fat, and other components, just grown independently of a whole animal.

For consumers, this means cultivated meat can deliver the same eating experience as traditional meat, whereas plant-based products, while improving, are a different category altogether.

In short, cultivated meat is real meat produced differently: instead of raising a cow for years to get a steak, we can grow only the steak itself from a handful of cells. This approach uses biology and engineering to create meat in a controlled setting, which opens the door to many potential benefits in efficiency, ethics, and customization of nutrition.

Regulatory Approval

Because cultivated meat is a novel food, it faces scrutiny from food safety regulators. Ensuring safety is paramount before these products reach consumers.

Companies must demonstrate that their cell-culture process is safe, the end product is free of contaminants, and it is as wholesome as conventional meat. Different countries have different regulatory pathways, but momentum is building globally to approve cultivated meat for sale.

Singapore was the first country in the world to give the green light to cultivated meat. In December 2020, Singapore’s food agency (SFA) approved a cultivated chicken product for commercial sale, a historic milestone.

Diners in Singapore have since been able to order dishes made with lab-grown chicken, marking the first time in history that approved meat did not come from a slaughtered animal. This breakthrough proved that regulators are open to the technology when safety standards are met.

In 2023, the United States became the second country to approve cultivated meat for consumers. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluated the safety of cultivated chicken, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspected and approved the production process, both agencies needed to sign off.

In June 2023, at least two companies received full regulatory approval to sell their cultivated chicken, after rigorous reviews by both the FDA and USDA. This means restaurants in the U.S. can now serve dishes with cell-based chicken, under the same food safety regulations as traditional meat.

Other countries are following suit. Regulators in the EU, UK, and China are actively assessing cultivated meat within their “novel food” frameworks. Each region is establishing guidelines to ensure cultured meat products are thoroughly tested for safety before they hit the market.

Government agencies and international bodies (like the FAO and WHO) have also been studying cultivated meat; one joint expert review found that cultivated meat is essentially the same as conventional meat in composition and confirmed that existing food safety measures can be adapted to cover its production. In short, a global regulatory groundwork is being laid.

For cultivated meat producers, navigating approval is a challenging but critical process. They must prepare detailed safety dossiers on everything from the cell lines they use, to the nutrients in the cell culture media, to the cleanliness of their facilities.

Regulators need to ensure that these products are free of harmful substances, that there are no unexpected allergens or toxins, and that they are produced consistently and hygienically. The good news is that early approvals in places like Singapore and the U.S. have set important precedents.

These first successes show that when cultivated meat meets strict standards, authorities will give a nod to bring it to consumers’ plates. As more countries join in approving cultured meat, the industry is working closely with regulators to maintain high safety standards from the start.

This proactive approach was a hot topic at the recent San Francisco food tech event. Experts stressed that regulatory and sustainability considerations must be baked in early so that the cultivated meat sector grows responsibly and gains public trust.

Each new approval around the world is not just a win for one company, but a validation of cultivated meat as safe to eat and ready for a larger role in our food system.

Sustainability

One of the most compelling reasons to pursue cultivated meat is its potential to dramatically reduce the environmental impact of meat production.

Traditional livestock farming, while effective at producing food, is resource-intensive and polluting: it requires huge expanses of land for grazing or growing feed crops, consumes large quantities of water, and generates significant greenhouse gas emissions (notably methane from cattle).

In contrast, producing meat from cells could be far more efficient and gentle on the planet.

Early studies comparing cultivated meat to conventional meat suggest enormous sustainability gains.

For example, a life-cycle analysis found that cultivated meat could generate up to 92% less greenhouse gas emissions than beef farming. It could also use up to 95% less land and 78% less water to produce the same amount of meat.

Think about that: instead of dedicating acres of farmland to raise a single cow (along with crops to feed it), a cultivator could produce the same meat in a much smaller facility with a fraction of the inputs.

Freeing up land means reducing deforestation (which is often driven by clearing space for cattle or soy fields for feed). Using less water eases the burden on our rivers and aquifers that irrigation and livestock drinking needs impose. And fewer greenhouse gases mean a lighter footprint on the climate, helping combat global warming.

Of course, the sustainability of cultivated meat depends on how it’s done at scale, notably, the source of energy for the production facilities. If powered by renewable energy, the carbon footprint of cultivated meat shrinks dramatically.

Experts project that with green energy, cell-based meat could potentially cut emissions by well over 90% versus conventional meat. Even if the energy grid isn’t fully green yet, cultivated meat facilities are more flexible in location, which means they could be set up in regions with clean energy or even on-site solar panels.

The recent FAO assessment of cell-based meat noted that it “has the potential to be a more sustainable alternative” to current meat production, especially as technology improves and processes scale efficiently.

Beyond carbon and land metrics, cultivated meat offers other environmental benefits. It virtually eliminates the massive amounts of manure and waste runoff that come from concentrated animal feeding operations, which means less water pollution (no manure lagoons or excess nutrients fouling waterways).

It also does not require antibiotics to be added regularly (in factory farming, antibiotics are often used to promote growth and prevent disease in crowded conditions, contributing to antibiotic resistance and residues). Producing meat in a clean facility means no manure-born pathogens, and a greatly reduced risk of problems like E. coli contamination that can occur in slaughterhouses.

In essence, it’s a more controlled and sanitary process, akin to brewing beer or yogurt in a factory, rather than raising animals in unpredictable outdoor conditions.

Cultivated meat is not yet at a commercial scale where we can measure real-world environmental savings, but the projections are highly encouraging. Even if exact numbers vary by study, all analyses agree on the trend: cultivated meat can significantly shrink the environmental footprint of our meat supply.

By complementing traditional agriculture with cell-based production, we could potentially feed more people using fewer resources. As one report put it, this could be “the future of meat without the downside”.

While there are still debates (some recent research is examining energy usage and urging continued innovation to ensure cultivated meat stays eco-friendly at scale), the consensus is that if done right, growing meat from cells could help solve the sustainability puzzle that conventional meat has long posed.

The Role of Bioreactors

If cultivated meat is going to deliver on its promise, it needs to be produced efficiently and in large volumes. This is where the unsung heroes of the process come in: bioreactors.

A bioreactor is essentially a vessel (often a big stainless-steel tank) where the cell culturing happens, think of it as the “farm” for growing cells instead of animals. Bioreactors maintain the precise conditions the animal cells need to grow: the right temperature, sterile environment, plenty of nutrients and oxygen, and gentle mixing so that all cells have access to what they need.

In many ways, they resemble the fermenters used in breweries or pharmaceutical production. However, for cultivated meat, bioreactors must operate at a scale and efficiency that goes beyond what’s been done before in biotech.

The challenge is enormous: to make a meaningful dent in global meat supply, we might have to grow billions of kilograms of meat in bioreactors.

To put it in perspective, humans currently consume over 300 million tons of meat annually worldwide. One expert illustrated the scale by noting that even to capture just 1% of the global meat market, the industry would require around 12,000 bioreactors of 100,000-liter capacity each, running 24/7. That’s a staggering number, considering today’s cultivated meat prototypes are often grown in bioreactors of a few thousand liters or smaller.

This is why the food tech event in San Francisco emphasized that biomanufacturing is key, scaling up cultivated meat means scaling up bioreactors and the whole infrastructure around them. The industry recognizes that current bioreactors (largely adapted from biopharmaceutical manufacturing) will need to be reimagined for food-scale volumes. In short, solving the bioreactor challenge is central to making cultivated meat widely available and affordable.

The good news is that companies like Stämm and SuperMeat are already racing to innovate on this front. Many startups have plans to move from the lab bench to pilot plants and beyond, using scalable bioreactors.

Today, production is mostly at the kilogram scale in small tanks. But in the next few years, firms intend to deploy bioreactors of several thousand liters, enabling production in the order of tons. Essentially, they are building mini “meat breweries.”

These companies are exploring various bioreactor designs and strategies to optimize growth and cut costs. For example, some are experimenting with stirred-tank reactors vs. air-lift reactors, seeking which design yields better cell densities. Others, like Stämm, are working on switching from batch processes (growing one batch of cells at a time) to continuous processes (where cells can be harvested continuously or in cycles, much like a continual brewing process).

Techniques like media recycling and filtration are also in development, aiming to reuse the costly nutrient broth and thereby drive down expenses. All these efforts boil down to a simple goal: make more meat per tank, faster and cheaper.

We’re already seeing promising breakthroughs. At the San Francisco summit, it was noted that biomanufacturing innovation can solve many production and quality challenges that cultivated meat faces. One striking example is the use of automated, continuous bioreactors.

In a recent pilot project, our innovative bubble-free continuous bioreactor demonstrated it could boost cell growth productivity by 15-fold compared to standard methods. This means far more meat output from the same volume, which directly translates to lower cost per pound. Such improvements are game-changing if replicated at scale; a 15x increase could turn a process that produces 100 kg of meat into 1,500 kg with the same equipment, radically improving economics.

These advanced bioreactors also contribute to product quality. The continuous gentle cultivation can help cells mature into muscle fibers and even fat tissue in a more structured way.

In addition to hardware innovations, there’s a whole realm of bioprocess optimization happening. Companies are fine-tuning the mix of nutrients (amino acids, sugars, growth factors) in the broth to maximize cell growth and maturation.

Some are using AI models to optimize feed rates and timing. Others are selecting cell lines that grow faster or require fewer growth factors. But no matter the approach, the central piece is the bioreactor where it all comes together.

One industry survey highlighted that nearly every cultivated meat startup is focused on scaling up bioreactors and cutting the cost of inputs as their top R&D priorities. The industry has even started to borrow terminology from traditional meat production, talking about reaching “pilot scale,” “industrial scale,” and eventually “commodity scale” with bioreactors over 50,000 liters that could produce tens of tons of meat per batch.

Reaching that level will take time and significant investment, but each incremental jump in bioreactor size and efficiency is bringing cultivated meat closer to everyday reality.

All of this is to say: bioreactors are the engine driving cultivated meat’s future. They are where biology meets engineering in this field. Improvements in bioreactor design and operation directly determine how quickly costs can fall and volumes can rise.

Early adopters and investors in food tech understand that a lot of value in this sector will come from those who can master biomanufacturing. Just as Henry Ford’s assembly line revolutionized car production, the companies that perfect the equivalent for cultivated meat (a “cell assembly line”) will lead the way.

It’s a thrilling engineering problem and a necessary one to solve, and with each innovation, we see cultivated meat moving from a niche concept toward an efficient, scalable method to produce protein for millions.

How Cultivated Meat Complements Traditional Meat

A common question is whether cultivated meat will replace farm-raised meat. The reality, and indeed the intention, is that cultivated meat is meant to complement traditional meat, not outright replace it. Think of it as adding another tool in our toolbox to produce the protein we need.

Traditional livestock farming has been humanity’s main source of meat for millennia and will likely continue to play a role for the foreseeable future. Cultivated meat enters the scene as an additional way to make meat, one that can alleviate some of the pressure on our food system.

Industry leaders often emphasize choice and coexistence. As one alternative protein advocate put it:

“We do not envision a world where meat production ends. We envision a world where you can choose. We see cultivated meat as a complement to existing food systems.”

In other words, tomorrow’s dinner plate might have beef from a ranch, chicken grown from cells, and plant-based sausage all side by side. It’s about expanding options, not eliminating what we have.

Cultivated meat can help fill gaps, for instance, meeting growing demand in regions where expanding livestock herds isn’t feasible, or providing certain specialty meats without overtaxing wildlife or farming systems. By producing some portion of meat through cell culture, we could potentially ease issues like overgrazing, feed crop overuse, and animal disease outbreaks in farm settings, all while farmers and ranchers continue doing what they excel at in parallel.

Rather than threatening traditional agriculture, cultivated meat can create new opportunities for it. Farmers could become suppliers of raw materials for the cell culture media (providing sugars, plant-based nutrients, etc., which are needed to feed the growing cells).

Some visionary farmers see a future where they might diversify, raising animals in more sustainable numbers while also possibly running cultivated meat bioreactors on site or in cooperative ventures. The entire protein industry stands to benefit from diversification.

It’s similar to how renewable energy complements fossil fuels during the transition to cleaner power. In food, we’re looking at a mix: conventional meat, cultivated meat, and plant-based alternatives together ensuring food security.

Notably, big players in the traditional meat industry are investing in cultivated meat, which underscores the complementarity. These companies recognize that supporting innovation in this area can be a win-win: they can diversify their product offerings (perhaps one day selling both conventional and cultivated meat products), and they can hedge against risks like supply shocks or disease that sometimes hit livestock supply chains.

Such collaboration was highlighted at the food tech event, multi-stakeholder partnerships (between startups, established food companies, investors, and even governments) are seen as crucial for the industry’s growth. Traditional meat producers bring expertise in distribution, scaling, and consumer preferences, while new cultivated meat companies bring cutting-edge tech and fresh ideas. Together, they can accelerate development and market acceptance.

From the consumer perspective, having cultivated meat complements traditional meat, means more choice and potentially more stable prices. For instance, if a drought or animal disease causes a spike in conventional meat prices, cultivated meat (which is produced in a controlled environment) could act as a buffer, keeping protein available and affordable.

Conversely, if cell-based meat faces an issue, conventional producers are still there to supply the market. This dual approach strengthens overall food resilience. It also lets consumers make choices based on their values: those concerned about animal welfare or environmental impact might lean towards cultivated options, while those who prefer the classic farm-sourced meat can have that, or they might enjoy both.

Crucially, framing cultivated meat as a complement helps reduce polarization. Rather than pitting “high-tech meat” against “traditional meat,” the narrative is that there is room and need for both.

The global demand for meat is so large and still growing that no single method of production (especially one constrained by planetary boundaries) will single-handedly satisfy it.

We’ll need conventional farming to become more sustainable and productive, and we’ll need alternative methods like cultivation to contribute alongside it. By working in tandem, these approaches can ensure we have enough protein for all without destroying the environment.

It’s reminiscent of how agriculture adopted new methods during the Green Revolution, new crop varieties and techniques boosted food supply without replacing old farms, instead helping them produce more.

In summary, cultivated meat isn’t about putting ranchers out of work; it’s about avoiding a scenario where we simply cannot raise enough animals to feed 10 billion people sustainably.

It offers a path to scale up meat production beyond the constraints of arable land and animal biology.

Traditional meat will continue to have cultural, economic, and culinary importance. Cultivated meat just adds a modern twist to meet modern challenges.

When you can have both a juicy steak from a ranch and a cruelty-free cultivated chicken fillet, why not embrace the broader palette of solutions? The future of food is about “and,” not “or”, and cultivated meat plus traditional meat together can help secure the food future we all want.

Conclusion

From the need to feed billions more people to the drive for sustainability, it’s clear that food tech innovations like cultivated meat matter today more than ever. We stand at a point where simply expanding old methods (raising more cattle, fishing more oceans) is not enough, and often not sustainable.

Cultivated meat represents a bold new approach, one that leverages science and technology to create real meat smartly. It addresses several pain points at once: offering the promise of scale to meet growing demand, the potential for a lighter environmental footprint, and the ability to give consumers the meat they love without the same ethical or resource concerns.

The journey is just beginning, but the progress so far, from the first lab burger to actual regulatory-approved products, shows that this is no longer a fantasy but an emerging industry.

As we look forward, a few things are becoming evident. First, biomanufacturing will be at the heart of this food revolution.

To make cultivated meat commonplace, companies must achieve production volumes and efficiencies that were unheard of in biotech until now. That means investing in infrastructure, innovation, and talent at the intersection of biology and engineering.

It means building the food equivalent of microchip fabs or automobile assembly lines, facilities that can churn out consistent, affordable products at a massive scale. The recent developments discussed (like continuous bioreactors and optimized processes) give confidence that these hurdles can be overcome. With each iteration, costs are coming down and output is going up.

Second, collaboration and partnerships will shape the path ahead. No single entity can transform the $1+ trillion global meat industry alone.

Food tech startups, legacy meat companies, researchers, and regulators will need to continue working together. We’ve already seen joint ventures and investments bridging the old and new guards, and this will likely accelerate.

Governments, too, play a role, not just in regulation but in possibly funding R&D or incentivizing sustainable practices. This ecosystem approach was a key takeaway from the San Francisco food tech event: it takes a community to scale a new food sector, from supply chains for growth media to training workers for this new kind of food production.

Third, consumer acceptance will be crucial, and that’s tied to awareness and availability. Early adopters are eager to try cultivated meat (surveys show a majority are willing to taste it), but broader public acceptance will grow once people can actually experience these products in everyday life.

That means getting cultivated meat into restaurants and retail in a way that emphasizes its benefits (sustainability, no antibiotics, etc.) while reassuring customers on safety and taste.

Storytelling, like sharing that a cultivated chicken parm came from a few cells instead of a farm, will help demystify the concept.

Over time, if cultivated meat delivers on price and taste, it’s likely to be judged by consumers just as any other food: “Is it good? Is it affordable?” The novelty will wear off, and it will simply become another choice at the supermarket. Reaching that point is the goal.

Finally, it’s worth highlighting how companies at the forefront of biomanufacturing technology fit into this future.

Take Stämm, for example. We are an innovator in the biomanufacturing space, working on next-generation platforms to grow cells more efficiently. Our approach involves developing cutting-edge continuous bioreactor systems, the Bioprocessor, that automate and streamline cell cultivation.

In partnership with cultivated meat producers, such technology can make a significant difference. Stämm’s continuous bubble-free bioreactor design has already demonstrated a 15-fold increase in volumetric productivity in cell culture, along with notable cost reductions.

Integrating this kind of advanced bioreactor into cultivated meat production means being able to produce much more meat with the same footprint, which is exactly the leap that the industry needs. It’s a great example of how a biotech company’s innovation (originally used in the pharmaceutical and stem cell realm) can be applied to food tech to solve bottlenecks.

Stämm’s work, automating and scaling the cultivation process, shows how the future of cultivated meat will be built on sophisticated, efficient manufacturing tech behind the scenes. By providing these biomanufacturing solutions, we enable cultivated meat startups like SuperMeat to focus on product development and distribution, confident that the volume and cost targets can be met. It’s the kind of synergy that accelerates progress.

In conclusion, the advent of cultivated meat is a testament to human ingenuity in the face of global challenges. We are effectively learning to “grow” meat the way we brew beer or culture yogurt, with enormous implications for sustainability and food security.

It’s an exciting time for this technology’s early adopters and entrepreneurs, who will get to taste and shape this new market; for potential clients and investors, who have the opportunity to be part of a transformative growth story; and for everyone who cares about the future of food.

Cultivated meat won’t solve all our problems overnight, nor will it replace the food traditions we hold dear. But it offers a bold additional path, one where science, dinner, and sustainability intersect.

With continued innovation, smart regulation, and a collaborative spirit, cultivated meat and other food tech innovations can ensure that our growing planet has plenty on its plate for generations to come.

The table is set; now the future of meat is for us to cultivate, together.